Mobile Payment Magazine

  • The Basics
  • News
  • Research
  • Events
  • Company Profiles

Mobile Wallets: The Business and the Brand

August 14, 2013 by Mobile Payment Magazine

Mobile wallets are being introduced to the market in a steady stream of configurations from passive containers to dynamic payment products. Companies large and small are vying for a piece of a future market. Along the way, these emerging payment forms are reshaping traditional business models and impacting traditional acceptance brands.

In a new research report, Mobile Wallets: The Business and the Brand, Mercator Advisory Group applies a business model canvas approach to analyze examples of developing mobile wallet types based on first-person interviews with the leaders of these companies. In addition, this report breaks apart the impact of branding based on different mobile wallet structures to discuss the effect on traditional payment brands as well as the challenges new acceptance marks face in the market. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Research Tagged With: Apple, FlimMoney, Lemon Wallet, MasterCard, MasterPass, Mercator Advisory Group, Paydiant, PayPal, PreCash, Starbucks, V.me, Visa

Digital Money in Pakistan – 2013 Report

March 7, 2013 by Mobile Payment Magazine

Digital Money PakistanThis report by Shift Thought Ltd entitled “Digital Money in Pakistan” has been designed specifically for the use of global players such as banks, operators and technology providers. They fill a gap in the market, and although offered at a report price, this is not a run-of-the-mill paper report.

This Pakistan report is developed to a high specification in order to help experts including development organisations like CGAP, by providing little known information and detailed analysis as a one-stop reference to understand Payments Systems and Innovations in this market. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Research Tagged With: Abu Dhabi Group, Access Group Pakistan, Allied Bank Pakistan (ABL), American Express, Asasah MFI, Askari Bank Pakistan, Bank Afalah Limited, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), China Mobile, Citibank, Digital Money, Dubai Islamic Bank, Etisalat Group, Faysal Bank Limited, Fundamo, Gemalto, GSMA, Habib Bank, Habibmetro Bank, Khushhali Bank, MasterCard, MCB Bank, Meezan Bank, Mobilink (Orascom), MoneyGram, National Bank of Pakistan, Nokia, Orascom Telecom Group, Pakistan, PayPal, Shift Thought Ltd, Standard Chartered Bank Pakistan, State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), Sybase 365, Tameer, Telenor, Telenor Group, TransferTo, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), Ufone, Utiba, VeriFone, Visa, Warid, Waseela Microfinance Bank, Wateen Zong, Western Union, World Bank, Xpress Money Services

Report: Delineating the Mobile Value Chain – A Holistic View of Mobile Payment

September 2, 2012 by Mobile Payment Magazine

As excitement surrounding mobile payments develops, most of the focus has been placed on the wallet apps such as Google Wallet and Isis jockeying for position. However, the success of a mobile payments system will depend on far more than which piece of software will be used on the most devices. A fully functional system will require the integration of a number of different factors, including POS terminals, processing, the devices themselves, and more. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Research Tagged With: ACI, AJB, American Express, Apple, CASSIS International, First Data, Foursquare, Gemalto, google, Groupon, Heartland Payment Systems, Ingenico, Isis, LevelUp, mFoundry, Mobeam, Naratte, Paydiant, PayPal, Research and Markets, RIM, Samsung, SK C&C, Square, Starbucks, VeriFone, Visa, Yelp

Mobile Payment Strategies Report: Opportunities & Markets 2011-2015

July 5, 2012 by Mobile Payment Magazine

Mobile Payment ReportA new study from Juniper Research has determined that the total value of mobile payments for digital and physical goods, money transfers and NFC (Near Field Communications) transactions will reach $670bn by 2015, up from $240bn this year. These forecasts represent the gross merchandise value of all purchases or the value of money being transferred.

The new Mobile Payment Strategies report revealed that all segments will exhibit 2x to 3x growth over the next five years. This growth will be driven by the rapid adoption of mobile ticketing, NFC contactless payments, physical goods purchases and money transfers as people in both developed and developing countries use their devices for everyday transactions. [Read more…]

Filed Under: Research Tagged With: 1-800 Flowers.com, Absa Bank, accells, Access Group, Aepona, Air Kenya, airG, Airtel, AIS, Alloy Ventures, Alternet, Amadeus, Amadeus Capital Partners, Amazon.com, Appium, Apple, Arriva Bus, Aruba Networks, AT&T, ATMU, Avea, Axis, Axis Bank, Babies “R” Us, Badoo, Banco de Oro Universal Bank, bango, Bank of Ceylon, Bank of Commerce and Development, Barclays, Battery Ventures, Bell Canada, Bell ID, Bharti, Bharti Airtel, Bharti Telesoft, BICS, BilltoMobile, bitWallet, BKM, BlackBerry Partners Fund, Bouygues, BPI, Brooks Brothers, BSI, BT, C-Sam, Cabela’s, Cebu Pacific, Celpay, Central Bank, CHARGE Anywhere, Citi, Citibank, Ciudad Mexico, Claro Group, Comviva, Copenhagen Metro, Cosmote, Credit Agricole, Credit Saison, Danal, Daylight Partners, DBS Bank, DeviceFidelity, Digby, Digby Chengdu Technology, Digital China, DN Capital, Draper Fisher Juvertson, DSB, DSB S-trains, Eagle Eye Solutions, EastNets, Easypaisa, eBay, eBay Mobile, EnStream, Equity Bank, Ericsson, Ericsson IPX, eServGlobal, EVN, EZ-Link, Ezuza, Facebook, Faulu Kenya, FINNAIR, First Data Corporation, France Telecom, Fundamo, G&D, Gameloft, Garanti Bank, Gemalto, Giesecke & Devrient, Globe, Globe Telecom, Golfsmith, google, Gtel, HBD Venture Capital, Hutch, Hypercom, IBM, ICC, ICICI, Idea, Indosat, ING, Ingenico, Intuit, IPX, Jamster, Jet Airways, JR East, JR West, Juniper Research, KASIKORNBANK, KDDI, Kenya Airways, KPN, KT, la Caixa, LG, Liberty Mutual, LINK Mobility, LMT, Lufthansa Systems, Luup, Maldives Monetary Authority, Maritz Real-Time, MasterCard, Maxis, MCB Bank, McDonalds, MCell, mChek, Meditel, Metro Company, MFIC, MGL, Minick, Miven, Mobifone, Mobilink, MobiVending, Mocapay, Monitise, MoreMagic, Morpho, Motorola, Movaya Chengdu Technology, Movaya Wireless, Movia, Movincom, Mozido, mService, mSolutions, MTN Group, MTS, MTV, Multiply, Myway, Naivas, NCR, Nearbuy Systems, NETS, Netsize, Neustar, NFO Hold, ngpay, Nokia, Nokia Siemens Network, NRJ Mobile, NTT docomo, NXP Semiconductors, Obopay, OpenMarket, Oracle, Orange, Orange Group, Orascom, Orient Corporation, Orvis, PayForIt, Paymate, PayPal, PayPal Mobile, Paytong, PesaPoint, PETCO, Philippine Airlines, Playphone, PLDT, Polaris, Polaris Ventures, PPC, PROSA, Quest Diagnostics, Rakuten, Reliance, Remgro, RIM, RiskSecure, Rogers Communications, S1 Corporation, S3 Ventures, Safaricom, Safarilink, Samsung, Sanlam, Santander, SAP Ventures, SBB, SEAIR, Sfone, SFR, Skype, SMART, Smart Communications, SmartPay, SoftBank, Softbank Mobile, Sony, Sony Ericsson, Sprint, StarHub, State Bank of India, State Bank of Vietnam, Sulake, Sumitomo Mitsui Card Co., Sun Oracle, Sybase 365, T+, TATA, Tata AIG Insurance, TDC, Tech Process Solutions, Telcel, Tele2, Telefonica, Telefonica O2, Telenor, TeliaSonera, Telma, Telus, TELUS Corp, Tetherball, The Home Depot, The NASDAQ OMX Group, The World Bank, Tigo, TIM, Toys “R” Us, Transoft, Tre, TRUE, True Move, TSYS, Twinlinx, Twitter, Uchumi, Ugg Australia, Uninor, Unwire, Utiba, Utiba Americas, Vagverket, Valista, Venda, VenFin, Venyon, VeriFone, Verisign, Vietcombank, Vietnamobile, Viettel, Vimpelcom, VinaPhone, Virgin Media, Virgin Mobile, Visa, Vision Capital, ViVOtech, Vodafone, Vodafone Qatar, Watchdata, Western Union, WIZZIT, World Bank, Yahoo!, YellowPepper, Yoigo, ZAPA, Zest Airways, Zong

Research Report: Positioning for Payments in the New Mobile-Social Technology Era

March 23, 2012 by Mobile Payment Magazine

We are at the beginning of a new technology cycle as consumer adoption of mobile and social media extends the reach of the web and integrates those media into the physical world.

Facebook is only eight years old, and yet its planned $5 billion IPO is the largest Internet IPO ever. As in every new technology cycle, network effects make room for new players and the creation—and destruction—of vast amounts of wealth.

The Gang of Four—Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google—is a group of network players entering the banking and payments environment. How will the strengths and weaknesses of the Gang of Four play against those of major financial institutions, payment networks, and wireless carriers? Surprisingly, PayPal rates on equal footing with the Gang of Four when it comes to innovation and emerges as a possible leader in the next tech cycle.

Research & Markets recently released a report entitled Positioning for Payments in the New Mobile-Social Technology Erathat  focuses on the relationship of brands to consumer perceptions of trust, innovation, and privacy in order to identify opportunities and threats.

Primary Questions

  • What is the newest technology cycle? Which brands are positioned to take advantage of the next cycle?
  • What models are developing that will intersect with the financial services space?
  • How will the strengths and weaknesses of the Gang of Four play against those of major financial institutions, payment networks, and wireless carriers?
  • How well do consumers trust the Gang of Four compared with the major financial institution, payment network, and wireless carrier brands when it comes to their financial information?
  • How do consumers rate the Gang of Four compared with the major financial institution, payment network and wireless carrier brands when it comes to protecting their private information?
  • Which brands are viewed as most innovative?
  • How do customers of the primary financial institutions rate their own institutions on the issues of trust, innovation, and privacy?
  • How should brands position themselves to best compete in the new technology cycle?


Methodology
The report is based mainly on data collected online from a random-sample bank benchmark panel of 5,878 consumers in December 2011. The survey targeted respondents based on proportions of gender, ethnicity, age, and income representative of those of the overall U.S. online population. The margin of sampling error is ±1.28% at the 95% confidence level.

It is also based on a survey of 5,211 consumers conducted online in October 2011 on KnowledgePanel. This sample is representative of the U.S. census demographics distribution and is recruited from the Knowledge Networks panel. Data is weighted using 18+ U.S. Population Benchmarks for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, census region, and metropolitan status from the September 2011 Current Population Survey (CPS) and household Internet access from the October 2010 CPS Supplement. The margin of sampling error is ±1.73% at the 95% confidence level.

Table of Contents

  • Overview
  • Methodology
  • Executive Summary
  • Platforms That Are Able to Gather the Biggest User Base Usually Gain the Most Power and Wealth in Each
  • Technology Cycle
  • Mobile + Social Defines the Newest Technology Cycle
  • Wealth Is Created—and Destroyed—During Each New Technology Cycle
  • Apple, Amazon, Google, and Facebook
  • Platforms That Gather the Biggest User Base Usually Gain the Most Power and Wealth in Each Technology Cycle
  • Mobile Platform
  • Two Diverging Views of Mobile Success—Open (Google) vs Protected (Apple)
  • Social Media Platform
  • Mobile-Social Integration Opens Opportunity for Competitor to Move on Facebook
  • Game-Changing Business Models Rapidly Emerge During Times of Technological Upheaval
  • Tablets
  • Alliances Can Use Mutual Strengths and Weaknesses Can Fill Gaps to Respond Faster and with Better Products
  • Javelin TIP Model for Mobile Wallets
  • Trust
  • Apple Leads in Innovation—at Least for Now
  • Innovation
  • Privacy
  • Don’t Count out the Financial Institution’s Primary Relationship with the Consumer
  • No Brand Reaches the Gold Zone—Without an Alliance
  • Appendix
  • Related Research
  • Companies Mentioned

– Amazon, American Express, Apple, AT&T, Bank of America, Chase, Citibank, Discover, Facebook, Google, MasterCard, Microsoft, PayPal, Research In Motion, Sprint, Twitter, U.S. Bank, Verizon, Visa, Wells Fargo, zvelo

More information: Research and Markets

Filed Under: Research Tagged With: Amazon, American Express, Apple, AT&T, Bank of America, Chase, Citibank, Discover, Facebook, google, MasterCard, Microsoft, PayPal, Research in Motion, Sprint, Twitter, U.S. Bank, Verizon, Visa, Wells Fargo, zvelo

Mobile Contactless Payments Summit: Oct. 17-18, 2011, Chicago, IL

October 7, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

Strategic Solutions Network (SSN) will welcome an estimated 400 executives from leading retailers, banks, carriers and technology companies to attend the Mobile Contactless Payments Summit  October 17-18th, 2011 at the W Chicago City Center.

The 3rd Mobile Contactless Payment Innovations Summit is part of the Alternative Payment Systems Innovations (APSI) series of conferences featuring the top visionaries in the mobile space who will examine the disruptive nature, promises and challenges of the rapidly evolving mobile payments industry.

“We have developed the agenda to focus on the most advanced and value-added developments within mobile payments. This has resulted in over threefold audience growth since our Inaugural event last October,” comments SSN CEO, Aron Barkan. “This illustrates that contactless payments is not just a trend, but will soon become a ubiquitous and universally adopted global solution.”

Conference organizers note that  senior executives should incorporate a sophisticated mobile payments strategy into their overall business plan. The World Payments Report 2011 projects that mobile payments will grow globally from 4.6 billion to 15.3 billion transactions between 2010 and 2013 – at a rate of 48.8 percent per year.

Additionally, a new study from Juniper Research has determined that the total value of mobile payments for digital and physical goods, money transfers and NFC (Near Field Communications) transactions will reach $670 billion by 2015, up 178% from the $240 billion estimated for 2011.

The two-day conference features best practice case studies, keynote presentations, panel discussion and networking sessions delivered by executives from leading companies such as Paypal, Google, Walgreens, Best Buy, Groupon, MasterCard, Bank of America, Nokia, The Home Depot, Polo Ralph Lauren, Jamba Juice, Discover Network, RadioShack, National Retail Federation, Barclaycard US, Citigroup, Verizon, National Restaurant Association, American Express and others.

For more information:  Payment Innovations

Filed Under: Events Tagged With: Alternative Payment Systems Innovations, American Express, Bank of America, Barclaycard US, Best Buy, Citigroup, Discover Network, google, Groupon, Jamba Juice, MasterCard, Mobile Contactless Payments Summit, Mobile Payment Conferences, National Restaurant Association, National Retail Federation, Near Field Communications, NFC, Nokia, PayPal, Polo Ralph Lauren, RadioShack, Strategic Solutions Network, The Home Depot, Verizon, Walgreens, World Payments Report 2011

Research Report: 2011 Contactless Near Field Communication (NFC) Mobile Payments

September 5, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

Javelin Strategy and Research has release a new report entitled “2011 Contactless Near Field Communication (NFC) Mobile Payments: Framing Mobile Payments on the Foundation of Mobile Banking.”

Mobile payments have been the source of much excitement for over half a decade, with the latest focus being on near field communication (NFC) payments, which uses short-range wireless technologies to allow a consumer to tap or wave a supporting mobile phone to complete an in-store payment.

Late 2010 experienced a flurry of NFC-related mobile payments announcements, detailing pilot initiatives from numerous financial institutions (FIs), payment networks, mobile phone carriers, technology giants, and third-party developers.

Despite this activity, mobile contactless/NFC is a payment option that is battling limited availability of contactless-ready merchant terminals and mobile technology, as well as low consumer demand. In order to ensure the greatest opportunity for success, FIs should integrate NFC mobile payments with their existing mobile banking platform. Javelin data shows that mobile bankers are the prime financial demographic to jumpstart mobile payments, and FIs should promote the service accordingly.

Primary Questions

  • What is the current state of the contactless payment market, and how has it changed from recent years?
  • What are the key drivers preventing consumer adoption of contactless payments?
  • How should FIs integrate mobile contactless pilots within their existing financial infrastructure, and who should the target demographic be?
  • What are some of the current NFC programs in market today?
  • What is the demographic makeup of today’s contactless payment population, and how can that information be utilized to boost mobile NFC adoption?
  • How can FIs establish the value proposition of NFC among merchants, in an effort to increase merchant acceptance of the service?

Report Index

  • Overview
  • Primary Questions
  • Methodology
  • Executive Summary
  • The State of U.S. Contactless and Mobile Commerce
  • The Consumer Roadmap to Mobile Payments
  • Mobile Banking as the Springboard for Mobile Contactless Payments
  • Demographic Trends – Who Are the Likely Mobile Contactless Users of Today?
  • Mobile Contactless Payments: The Proverbial Chicken and the Egg Dilemma
  • Appendix
  • Related Research
  • Companies Mentioned

Table of Figures

Figure 1: Mobile Payments Ecosystem
Figure 2: Percent of Consumers Who Indicate That They Are Open to Using a Contactless-Enabled Card or Device, 2007-2010
Figure 3: Key Drivers Preventing Contactless Adoption, by All Consumers
Figure 4: Consumer Adoption Roadmap to Mobile Payments
Figure 5: Likelihood of Storing Credit or Debit Card Information on Mobile Phone to Complete a Mobile Payment, by Mobile Bankers and All Consumers
Figure 6: Factors That Drive Contactless Use, by Mobile Bankers and All Likely or Current Contactless Users
Figure 7: Last Time Made Purchase Using Mobile Device, by Mobile Bankers and All Mobile Phone Owners
Figure 8: Frequency of Mobile Purchasing in the Past Month, by Mobile Bankers and All Mobile Phone Owners
Figure 9: Average Mobile Purchase Amount, by Mobile Bankers and All Mobile Phone Owners
Figure 10: Desirability of Mobile Phone Functionality, by Frequent Mobile Bankers, Mobile Bankers (Past 90 Days), and All Mobile Phone Users
Figure 11: Likelihood of Using Mobile Contactless, by Gender, Generation, and All Consumers
Figure 12: Likelihood of Using Mobile Contactless, by Ethnicity and All Consumers
Figure 13: Likelihood of Using Mobile Contactless, by Smartphone Owners, Standard Mobile Phone Owners, and All Consumers
Figure 14: Likelihood of Responding to Mobile Marketing Coupons or Promotions, by All Mobile Contactless Users and All Mobile Phone Owners
Figure 15: Percent of Consumers Who Have Used Particular Contactless Payment Devices, 2009-2010
Figure 16: Likelihood of Using a Contactless-Enabled Card or Device, by Mobile Bankers and All Consumers
Figure 17: Average Times Per Month Consumers Use a Particular Payment Option Per Month for In-Store Purchases
Figure 18: Likelihood of Using Mobile Contactless, by Income and All Consumers
Figure 19: Likelihood of Using Mobile Contactless, by iPhone Owners, BlackBerry Owners, and Android Owners

More information: 2011 Contactless Near Field Communication (NFC) Mobile Payments

Filed Under: Research Tagged With: AT&T. Isis, Bank of America, Bling Nation, Cardlytics, Cashedge, Citibank, ClairMail, DeviceFidelity, Discover, Edo Interactive, Fiserv, google, LivingSocial, M-Com, MasterCard, mFoundry, PayPal, RIM, Samsung, T-Mobile, VeriFone, Verizon, Visa

Chinese Company B.Shark to Extend Mobile Payment Offering to Physical Goods

August 17, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

Years ago, operator billing was only applied for value-added services such as ringtones, ring back tones, wallpaper, news, music, and the like. Later it was applied to other fields such as mobile games, game tools and the mobile application market. Now, operator billing is extending to more and more fields, including physical goods payments. B.Shark, a Chinese company offering worldwide mobile payment solutions, now plans to extend its offerings to physical goods payment.

Operators are concerned about being a communication/data channel only, so some operators are reducing operator revenue share, especially reducing their own revenue share when it comes to physical goods payments. That is to say, when customers pay for physical goods via operator billing, merchants will receive a higher revenue share than for virtual goods. This strategy will increase the competitive power of operators when competing with banks.

“B.Shark will launch a physical goods payment solution with the cooperation of an overseas e-commerce platform,” according to the marketing director of B.Shark.

Other mobile payment companies, such as Paypal, Boku and Zong, are also planning to cooperate with e-commerce platforms in the field of physical goods payments.

Source: B.Shark

Filed Under: News Tagged With: B.Shark, boku, China, MobilePayments, PayPal, Zong

B.Shark Holds Forum on Who Will Play a Leading Roll in Mobile Payments

August 8, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

B.Shark, a Chinese company offering worldwide mobile payment solutions, recently collaborated with SPforum, the largest microblog dedicated to the Mobile Internet industry in China, to hold a forum about who will play the leading role in worldwide mobile payments. The discussion was lively, and experts from Paypal and Alipay participated, among others.

Some highlights from the forum include:

  • “Telecom Operators, Financial Companies (such as Banks) and third-party payment companies (such as Alipay, Boku, Zong) are playing important roles in mobile payment,” said Mr. Peng, an expert from Paypal.
  • Operators have huge numbers of mobile subscribers and have a good understanding of  the behavior of mobile subscribers; and operators’ customer care centers can also be the customer service centers for mobile payment transactions.
  • The advantage of financial companies is that banks have the best understanding of customers’ payment behavior, and bank branches also can be the place to educate customers about how to use mobile payments.
  • Third-party payment companies, such as Alipay, Boku, Zong, Obopay and Square are playing a more and more important role in mobile payments. “Third-party payment companies always try to improve service for customers and integrate resource from different organizations in the payment value-chain; this is the advantage of third-party payment companies,” said Mr.Ding, an expert from Alipay.

In the area of global payments, mobile payment can be divided into three areas geographically. “In Asian countries, especially Japan and South Korea, with the strong support from operators, a large quantity of applications and services based on NFC drive NFC payment forward; In Africa, only around 20%-30% of adults have bank accounts, mobile payment via telecom networks are successful, M-Pesa in Kenya is an example; In America and Europe, the redit card industry is matured, however operators also try to play a role. For example, Everything Everywhere, O2 and Vodafone, formed a joint venture to accelerate the uptake of mobile commerce in the U.K, and AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon also formed a joint venture mobile company named Isis utilizing near-field communication (NFC) technology in the U.S.A,” said ZhongYuan, Zhang, COO of B.Shark. “The fact that eBay bought Zong for $240 million in cash, shows the value of third-party mobile payments focused on operator billing.”

The mobile payment chain is very long. It includes telecom operators, banks, third-party mobile payment companies, mobile phone producers, etc. When all the parties cooperate, the mobile payment will move faster and more smoothly.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Africa, Alipay, B.Shark, boku, China, Isis, Japan, MobilePayments, Obopay, PayPal, SPforum, Square, Zong

Hidden Costs in Cell-Phone and Digital-Wallet Payment Services, Says Consumer Reports

August 2, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

While Americans are still using plenty of cash, checks, credit and debit cards to pay their bills, new electronic methods such as paying by cell phone or digital wallets are emerging. Before jumping in, consumers should be aware of the disparity in loss liability and consumer protections they offer, according to Consumer Reports.

CR’s latest investigation into these new payment options finds that banks and technology companies are jostling for a greater share of the $50 billion a year in fees generated by everyday transactions. Some services by PayPal, Obopay, Square, Zong, and FaceCash already allow you to pay for purchases with your cell phone, but so-called digital wallet services are scheduled to hit the market soon.

Google said in May that it planned to launch its version this summer. At least three competing digital wallets are planned for launch later this year and in 2012: from Visa in partnership with more than a dozen banks; Isis, a joint venture of AT&T Mobility, T-Mobile, and Verizon Wireless; and PayPal Mobile’s point-of-sale technology.

“As these new forms of payment grow more popular, consumers must be careful to understand the costs, and disparities in protections associated with the promise of new convenience,” said Jeff Blyskal, sr. editor Consumer Reports.

Despite all the hype, consumers don’t seem to be clamoring to pay with their phones yet. According to a recent nationally representative survey by the Consumer Reports National Research Center, only 5 percent of survey respondents have used their cell phone to pay for day-to-day purchases in the previous month. Somewhat more use other fairly new forms of payment, including billing to their home or cell phone account (10 percent).

Most of the new electronic payment options are tied to credit and debit cards, so whatever costs consumers incur in using their plastic will transfer to the new methods. Paying by mobile phone won’t save them money. Google Wallet merchant transaction fees are the same as those charged on plastic payments, and the same is expected to be true for Visa’s digital wallet. Square and PayPal Mobile charge merchants even more than the average big bank fee, 2.75 and 2.9 percent of the transaction amount, respectively.

Among payment processors Consumer Reports looked at, only Obopay charges consumers (not merchants) an explicit flat 50-cent fee for payments over $10. You can transfer funds to your Obopay account from a bank account at no cost, but if you link a transaction to a debit or credit card, you’ll pay a 1.5 percent fee. So on a $100 payment, fees can run from 50 cents to $2.

Prepaid debit cards can be especially costly, whether you use them by themselves or link them to an alternative payment method. Many prepaid debit cards charge fees for activating and maintaining the accounts, and for transactions, balance inquiries, and reloading.

Things often go wrong during the processing of 300 million noncash payments each day. In a Consumer Reports survey, one in four Americans said they had an unauthorized charge, billing error, noncredited payment, or other problem in the last year when paying for purchases or paying bills.

A consumer’s right to get their money back when something goes wrong—errors, goods not delivered as promised, fraud — varies by the payment option used. Again, the underlying method of payment tied to your mobile device will govern their rights in such instances. Cell phone and digital wallet payment services linked to a credit card offer consumers the most protection. However, there is a large disparity in protection for services that link to prepaid debit cards and direct billing to consumers’ phone bill.

Prepaid cards offer consumers no guaranteed protections against unauthorized transactions. The cards may have some protections in their contracts, but they’re essentially voluntary and can be rescinded at any time. Visa and MasterCard prepaid-card holders may get assurances from those brands’ zero-liability policies, which protect against unauthorized use and require issuing banks to give provisional credit for losses from unauthorized use within five business days of notification. But those policies have loopholes. Visa’s doesn’t cover ATM or PIN transactions not processed by the Visa network. MasterCard’s policy offers no protection if a consumer reported two or more unauthorized events in the past 12 months, and it doesn’t cover ATM or PIN transactions.

For consumers who opt for direct-to-phone bill charges, their rights in this area are unclear. Any protections are based on the wireless carrier’s contract, and they vary widely. Consumers Union reviewed the contracts of 18 wireless carriers to find out what kind of baseline protections they contained; none provided protections for mobile payment transactions that are as strong as those guaranteed by law when consumers use a credit card or debit card.

Consumers may have some rights under state laws or public utility agency rules, but those also vary from state to state. So far, only the California Public Utilities Commission provides its state’s residents the right to reverse unauthorized charges. California consumers can also bar third parties from putting charges on their phone bill.

The bottom line—Consumer Reports offers the following advice for those considering the jump to any new form of digital payment service:

  • Before signing up for a new payment method, read the fine print and check the transaction costs.
  • Pay by credit card to get the best protections whenever you buy online or pay via cell phone, make a major purchase in a store, or worry that a seller might not deliver as promised. Avoid prepaid debit cards and billing to your telephone account.
  • Ask your carrier to block third-party charges to your landline and cell phone.
  • Take convenience claims with a grain of salt. Consider new payment choices, but separate true benefits from marketing hype.
  • Keep your mobile shopping tools independent from any branded digital wallet you might choose.

You can control the risk of loss by knowing the threats with each form of payment and taking steps to protect yourself. Don’t share your personal identification and account information, use security software and procedures for your e-commerce, and always keep cash and payment cards in a safe place.

The complete investigative report, including more information on the convenience come-on and security fraud issues surrounding new ways to pay at ConsumerReports.org or in the September, 2011 issue of Consumer Reports.

Source: PR Newswire

Filed Under: News Tagged With: AT&T, FaceCash, MobilePayment, Obopay, PayPal, Square, T-Mobile, Verizon

« Previous Page
Next Page »

STAY INFORMED

Twitter: MobilePmnt

Tags

American Express android Apple Apple Pay AT&T Bank of America boku China Facebook Gemalto google Google Wallet Intuit iPhone Isis MasterCard mFoundry Microsoft mobile banking mobile commerce mobile conferences mobile conferences 2011 MobilePayment Mobile Payment Research 2015 MobilePayments mobile wallet NFC Nokia Obopay Orange PayPal Research and Markets Samsung SMS Sprint Square Starbucks T-Mobile Unbanked VeriFone Verizon Visa Vodafone Wells Fargo Zong
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Copyright & Terms
  • Contact
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.