Mobile Payment Magazine

  • The Basics
  • News
  • Research
  • Events
  • Company Profiles

China NFC Payment Transaction Values to Top $8 Billion by 2014, Says Report

August 4, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

China could see more than $8 billion in mobile payments by 2014, according to ABI Research forecasts.

The Near Field Communication (NFC) market is moving forward on an uneven front. Google is aggressively supporting the technology through the latest generation of Android handsets from its partners such as Samsung. Nokia is introducing NFC-capable handsets, but the C7 and N9 only support non-secure applications and not contactless payment.

In China, however, device manufacturers and operators are keen to move ahead with contactless mobile payment. It will be interesting to see how ZTE, as a local OEM, implements its announced range of NFC smartphones and handsets.

Jake Saunders, VP for forecasting at ABI Research notes, “China is a big mobile payments market to play for. There were more than 868 million cellular subscribers as of the end of March 2011.”

China’s mobile payments industry is burgeoning, attracting many participants wishing to grab first-mover advantage and vie for a bigger slice of the pie. ABI Research estimates that NFC payment transaction values in China could surpass $8 billion by 2014. Financial institutions (China UnionPay), third party mobile payment service providers, and Mobile Network Operators (China Mobile, China Unicom and China Telecom) are all jostling for position. According to Saunders, “ABI Research believes the mobile payment market in China will largely adopt an MNO-led business model.”

The Chinese government has expressed a preference for an NFC device solution utilizing the 13.56 MHz frequency band. To break the classic chicken-and-egg cycle, there are bridging solutions intended to stimulate the contactless payment market. The principal one is contactless (NFC) SIM cards. WatchData’s SIMpass solution has attracted strong interest from all three operators.

As a result, more NFC handset add–ons are shipped than NFC-enabled mobile handsets: 2.5 million SIMpass add-ons and 50,000 SD add-ons, versus 45,000 handsets in 2010.

ABI Research’s “Mobile Payments in China” study, produced by the firm’s Singapore division, provides an overview of the contactless mobile payments ecosystem in China. It also explores the near-term regulatory directives and the payment technology competition among the key players, and points out the potential winners and losers.

Mobile Payments in China Report Overview

China is the world’s largest single mobile market. Indeed, China’s mobile payments industry is a burgeoning market. It is attracting a number of participants in an attempt to assume first mover advantage. While the market potential is very real, there is uncertainty over which proximity payment technology will ultimately secure dominance – RF SIM on the 2.4 GHz band versus NFC on the 13.56 MHz band. This survey attempts to provide an overview of the contactless mobile payments ecosystem in China. It also explores the near-term regulatory directives and the payment technology competition amongst the key players and points out the likely winners. The race to lead in China primarily exists among the MNOs, banking institutions and the third party mobile payment service providers. Each has its own competitive advantage and offering to consumers.

In this Report:

  • What are the opportunities for contactless payment in the Chinese market?
  • What standard does the government support?
  • How will NFC be implemented?
  • What is SIMpass?
  • Who are the key players in the Chinese mobile payment market?
  • What are the main bottlenecks?
  • How will the market evolve?

Target Audience:

  • smart card vendors
  • mobile operators
  • government planning departments
  • investment banks

Source: ABI Research

Filed Under: Research Tagged With: ABI Research, China, MobilePayment

Hidden Costs in Cell-Phone and Digital-Wallet Payment Services, Says Consumer Reports

August 2, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

While Americans are still using plenty of cash, checks, credit and debit cards to pay their bills, new electronic methods such as paying by cell phone or digital wallets are emerging. Before jumping in, consumers should be aware of the disparity in loss liability and consumer protections they offer, according to Consumer Reports.

CR’s latest investigation into these new payment options finds that banks and technology companies are jostling for a greater share of the $50 billion a year in fees generated by everyday transactions. Some services by PayPal, Obopay, Square, Zong, and FaceCash already allow you to pay for purchases with your cell phone, but so-called digital wallet services are scheduled to hit the market soon.

Google said in May that it planned to launch its version this summer. At least three competing digital wallets are planned for launch later this year and in 2012: from Visa in partnership with more than a dozen banks; Isis, a joint venture of AT&T Mobility, T-Mobile, and Verizon Wireless; and PayPal Mobile’s point-of-sale technology.

“As these new forms of payment grow more popular, consumers must be careful to understand the costs, and disparities in protections associated with the promise of new convenience,” said Jeff Blyskal, sr. editor Consumer Reports.

Despite all the hype, consumers don’t seem to be clamoring to pay with their phones yet. According to a recent nationally representative survey by the Consumer Reports National Research Center, only 5 percent of survey respondents have used their cell phone to pay for day-to-day purchases in the previous month. Somewhat more use other fairly new forms of payment, including billing to their home or cell phone account (10 percent).

Most of the new electronic payment options are tied to credit and debit cards, so whatever costs consumers incur in using their plastic will transfer to the new methods. Paying by mobile phone won’t save them money. Google Wallet merchant transaction fees are the same as those charged on plastic payments, and the same is expected to be true for Visa’s digital wallet. Square and PayPal Mobile charge merchants even more than the average big bank fee, 2.75 and 2.9 percent of the transaction amount, respectively.

Among payment processors Consumer Reports looked at, only Obopay charges consumers (not merchants) an explicit flat 50-cent fee for payments over $10. You can transfer funds to your Obopay account from a bank account at no cost, but if you link a transaction to a debit or credit card, you’ll pay a 1.5 percent fee. So on a $100 payment, fees can run from 50 cents to $2.

Prepaid debit cards can be especially costly, whether you use them by themselves or link them to an alternative payment method. Many prepaid debit cards charge fees for activating and maintaining the accounts, and for transactions, balance inquiries, and reloading.

Things often go wrong during the processing of 300 million noncash payments each day. In a Consumer Reports survey, one in four Americans said they had an unauthorized charge, billing error, noncredited payment, or other problem in the last year when paying for purchases or paying bills.

A consumer’s right to get their money back when something goes wrong—errors, goods not delivered as promised, fraud — varies by the payment option used. Again, the underlying method of payment tied to your mobile device will govern their rights in such instances. Cell phone and digital wallet payment services linked to a credit card offer consumers the most protection. However, there is a large disparity in protection for services that link to prepaid debit cards and direct billing to consumers’ phone bill.

Prepaid cards offer consumers no guaranteed protections against unauthorized transactions. The cards may have some protections in their contracts, but they’re essentially voluntary and can be rescinded at any time. Visa and MasterCard prepaid-card holders may get assurances from those brands’ zero-liability policies, which protect against unauthorized use and require issuing banks to give provisional credit for losses from unauthorized use within five business days of notification. But those policies have loopholes. Visa’s doesn’t cover ATM or PIN transactions not processed by the Visa network. MasterCard’s policy offers no protection if a consumer reported two or more unauthorized events in the past 12 months, and it doesn’t cover ATM or PIN transactions.

For consumers who opt for direct-to-phone bill charges, their rights in this area are unclear. Any protections are based on the wireless carrier’s contract, and they vary widely. Consumers Union reviewed the contracts of 18 wireless carriers to find out what kind of baseline protections they contained; none provided protections for mobile payment transactions that are as strong as those guaranteed by law when consumers use a credit card or debit card.

Consumers may have some rights under state laws or public utility agency rules, but those also vary from state to state. So far, only the California Public Utilities Commission provides its state’s residents the right to reverse unauthorized charges. California consumers can also bar third parties from putting charges on their phone bill.

The bottom line—Consumer Reports offers the following advice for those considering the jump to any new form of digital payment service:

  • Before signing up for a new payment method, read the fine print and check the transaction costs.
  • Pay by credit card to get the best protections whenever you buy online or pay via cell phone, make a major purchase in a store, or worry that a seller might not deliver as promised. Avoid prepaid debit cards and billing to your telephone account.
  • Ask your carrier to block third-party charges to your landline and cell phone.
  • Take convenience claims with a grain of salt. Consider new payment choices, but separate true benefits from marketing hype.
  • Keep your mobile shopping tools independent from any branded digital wallet you might choose.

You can control the risk of loss by knowing the threats with each form of payment and taking steps to protect yourself. Don’t share your personal identification and account information, use security software and procedures for your e-commerce, and always keep cash and payment cards in a safe place.

The complete investigative report, including more information on the convenience come-on and security fraud issues surrounding new ways to pay at ConsumerReports.org or in the September, 2011 issue of Consumer Reports.

Source: PR Newswire

Filed Under: News Tagged With: AT&T, FaceCash, MobilePayment, Obopay, PayPal, Square, T-Mobile, Verizon

NXP Lowers Outlook for NFC as Mobile-Payment Growth Slows

July 29, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

NXP Semiconductor NV, Europe’s third-largest chipmaker, lowered its outlook for near-field communication chip shipments in 2011 as mobile-phone operators expand wireless payment systems more slowly than expected. NXP, based in Eindhoven, Netherlands, now sees NFC deliveries at the lower end or “perhaps even slightly below” an initially predicted range of 40 million to 100 million units, Chief Executive Officer Richard Clemmer said on an analyst conference call late yesterday. [Read more…]

Filed Under: News Tagged With: MobilePayment, NFC, NXP

Mobile Banking and Payments Report: The Role of the Mobile Phone as a Banking Device

July 28, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

With over 2 billion users worldwide, mobile phone usage penetrates every core demographic of the world’s population. Research and Markets has announced the release of a new report entitled “ Mobile Banking and Payments.” The report assesses the role of the mobile phone as a banking device as well as a payment function. The report provides readers with the ability to:

  • Assess the prospects for mobile banking and payments
  • Learn how additional revenue can be raised through value added services
  • Review the strategic and operational issues that face the mobile banking sector
  • Study the profiles of leading banks within the mobile banking arena

After abandoning initial roll-outs a few years ago following poor consumer take up, banks worldwide are now re-entering the market. Mobile banking is an opportunity and a threat to established retail financial players. The first section of this report provides the business case for successful mobile banking. It presents the short-term solutions and the longer-term strategy needed to create a successful program.

Key Points Addressed in This Report:

  • The mobile banking phenomenon explained.
  • Trends among emerging and developed markets.
  • Mobile banking and mobile payments defined.
  • Reasons for low adoption by banking customers.
  • Importance of mobile as a marketing tool and as a customer retention strategy.
  • Negotiating the relationship between banks and mobile carriers.

Case Studies and Examples Include:

  • Bank of America
  • Blaze
  • Charles Schwab
  • Citi
  • ClairMail
  • Co-op Bank
  • Elite mBanking
  • Facebook
  • Fi-Mobile
  • First National Bank
  • iTunes
  • Mfoundry
  • Microsoft
  • Mshift
  • MTN bank
  • Nokia
  • Paypal
  • Regalo Card
  • St George Mobile Banking
  • Sun mBanking
  • Twitter
  • Vancity CU
  • Visa
  • Wells Fargo
  • Wizzit bank

Key Topics Covered:

  • Business case for mobile banking
  • Business case for mobile banking
  • Generate revenue through value added services
  • Enhance other delivery channels
  • Marketing via the mobile channel
  • Banking the unbanked
  • Strategic and operational issues
  • Choosing the technology platform
  • Security considerations
  • Usability considerations
  • Marketing considerations
  • Market profiles
  • USA
  • South Africa
  • Key emerging markets

More information: Research and Markets – “Mobile Banking and Payments Report”

 

Source: Business Wire

Filed Under: News, Research Tagged With: Bank of America, Blaze, Charles Schwab, Citi, ClairMail, Co-op Bank, Elite mBanking, Facebook, Fi-Mobile, First National Bank, iTunes, mFoundry, Microsoft, mobile payments research, MobileBanking, MobilePayment, MobilePayments, MShift, MTN bank, Nokia, PayPal, Regalo Card, St. George Mobile Banking, Sun mBanking, Twitter, Vancity CU, Visa, Wells Fargo, Wizzit Bank

Payment Methods for Chinese Social Networking Service (SNS) Games Exported to Southeast Asian Market

July 28, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

As Chinese game developers rush to explore the overseas market, game operation as well as in-game payment systems have become a hot topic for game developers.

Chinese game developers are running their games in the overseas markets in a number of ways: First, through massive global social networks, such as Facebook;  other developers prefer to run the games on their own platforms, like Elex-tech; and still others distribute their games via local operators. Game developers who choose the last option are free from worrying about game operating and recharging systems as the agent takes care of that; but if they choose the first option, especially publishing games on Facebook, they need to operate the game on their own and choose their own payment methods.

Regardless of the new Facebook payment policies,  there are three payment methods on Facebook:

  • Facebook credit and PayPal that binds with users’ debit or credit cards;
  • Local game recharging cards;
  • Mobile billing

Facebook credit and PayPal is popular in European countries but rarely in Southeast Asia, as local users are not accusto med to using credit cards.

Compared with PayPal, the use of game recharging cards is more widespread. Game recharging cards such as MOL are popular in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, but rarely in Southeast Asia.

As for mobile billing, it is not restricted by sales outlets and it fits the users’ need of paying anytime and anywhere. People choose mobile billing mostly because of its lower risks and ease of use, so it is an important payment method. For some small game developers, it would be difficult for them to go directly to the operators, so a preferrable solution may be to select a mobile billing solution provider that can supply them with customized service, such as provided by B.Shark, Boku and Zong.

In conclusion, not one of the payment solutions is perfect; they are complementary with each other, and Social Networking Service (SNS) game developers should optimize their payment system in order to maximum their income.

Source: B.Shark

Filed Under: News Tagged With: B.Shark, boku, China, Facebook, MobilePayment, MOL, Online Gaming, SNS, Southeast Asia, Zong

MNO’s Collaborate to Establish Hungarian Mobile Wallet Association

July 25, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

Hugary’s Magyar Telekom, Telenor and Vodafone have joined with three market leading operators–MasterCard, OTP Bank and SuperShop–to establish the Hungarian Mobile Wallet Association. The aim of the Association is to design and articulate recommendations for mobile NFC service standards in Hungary, and to submit proposals towards the successful implementation of the service.

Designed to operate over very short distances, Near Field Communication is a wireless switching technology, which facilitates contactless communication and exchange of data between two or even several devices over a secure channel.

The use of contactless bank cards (e.g. PayPass) through the mobile phone constitutes only one pillar of the service. Equally important are other features such as loyalty cards, coupons, travel and entrance tickets, etc. Services that are based on NFC technology are capable of ensuring new and highly attractive customer experiences through their speed, ease of use, innovative features and the possibilities provided by the large and interactive screen of the mobile phone.

This united move of Hungary’s MNOs  may help establish Hungary among the first countries where mobile NFC services are  launched in Europe.

Source: Hungarian Mobile Wallet Association

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Eastern Europe, Hungarian Mobile Wallet Association, Hungary, Magyar Telekom, MasterCard, MNO, Mobile Network Operator, MobilePayment, MobileWallet, OTP Bank, PayPass, SuperShop, Telemor, Vodafone

Daily Deals Get Mobile Payment Solution from Aggregator Monster Offers

July 25, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

Monster Offers, a mobile solutions company and Daily Deal aggregator, announced today its mobile payment strategy is well-positioned to meet the current needs of the Daily Deal industry. As Daily Deal providers converged at last week’s Deals 3D Conference in San Francisco, creating better mobile experiences and integrating mobile payment solutions prevailed as hot topics as the next phase of business development for the group buying industry.

Monster Offers’ ZalaPay mobile payment solution proved to resonate with Daily Deal providers as current payment methods lack tight integration with providers’ sites and distracts users from completing the purchase process, especially from mobile devices. The ZalaPay solution provides a truly integrated “in-app” purchase experience for the user, resulting in significant conversion of sales for the deal publisher.

According to Paul Gain, Monster Offers CEO, “Recent announcements for payment solutions from MasterCard, Google, American Express and Facebook all substantiate the power of our business model. We aim to provide an even greater value proposition to the user, deal provider, and merchant with our ZalaPay platform which provides an “in-app” purchase experience across all mobile platforms. When customers can purchase deals within the application, user conversion increases exponentially. With Monster Offers’ ZalaPay mobile payment solution, we are perfectly positioned to offer Daily Deal publishers a mobile payment solution that can increase sales and boost revenue.”

Monster Offers’ mobile financial services include “EZ-Click” Mobile Cashier, Pre-Paid Debit Cards, P2P Mobile Money, Redemption, and Daily Deal Wallet. The first of these integrated in-app mobile solutions is expected to be available later this summer.

Source: Business Wire

 

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Daily Deal, Daily Deal Wallet, Deals 3D Conference, EZ-Click Mobile Cashier, MobilePayment, Monster Offers, P2P Mobile Money, Pre-Paid Debit Cards, Redemption, ZalaPay

B.Shark Mobile Payment API Drives Up the China Phone Market

July 20, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

Just one month after launching the B.Shark mobile payment API, hundreds of mobile application developers and manufacturers have started the integration work, and shipped out the mobiles and have started generating income. Particularly the South East Asian market is showing a sharp increase at the beginning of July.

Most of the mobile manufactures integrated with B.Shark’s mobile payment API sell their mobiles to Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam in South-east Asia, to Brazil and Chile in South America, and to Nigeria and Ghana in Africa.

“It was very difficult for the mobile manufacturers to make any revenue on the pre-load mobile content before, because we do not have a connection with the operators and other service providers’ solutions cannot work on our mobile OS,” said a manager from the value added service department from one of the biggest manufacturers of China phones.
”Mobile users can now enjoy better and constant updated mobile content through GPRS networks, and with the B.Shark API, we can collect the revenue from the pre-loaded content, which would increase brand loyalty and the competitiveness of the manufacturers. With this kind of fierce competition in the industry, this extra income means a lot to us,” he added

The up-to-date data shows that hundreds of mobile manufactures have downloaded the B.Shark mobile payment API. With this API, they will be able to explore more areas in the overseas mobile market, and push the China phone market forward.

Source: B.Shark

Filed Under: News Tagged With: B.Shark, China, MobilePayment

MobilePayUSA Launches Virtual Terminal for Mobile Payments–Without NFC

July 13, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

TechCrunch Disrupt 2010 Startup Alley Winner MobilePayUSA announces that private beta-testing of the company’s non-NFC mobile payment solution has begun at the Tutti Frutti Frozen Yogurt in Balboa Island, California. Instead of waiting for NFC technology to become viable, Tutti Frutti is using the Virtual Terminal offered by MobilePayUSA for PC-based POS systems.

Unlike other e-wallets, MobilePayUSA does not use RFID chips embedded in smart phones that hold credit card numbers in order to process payments. Credit information is never stored on the phone or shared with the merchant with MobilePayUSA. This difference, according to MobilePayUSA, will prove to make their system more secure from the real
threat of illegal skimmers and hackers.

The company says their platform–unlike their NFC competitors–requires no expensive hardware upgrades. Instead, MobilePayUSA solution uses existing hardware to make the dream of mobile payments a reality, thus taking the cost hurdle out of the race for nationwide adoption.

MobilePayUSA will begin public beta-testing of their system by Q4 2011.

Source: MobilePayUSA

Filed Under: News Tagged With: MobilePayment, MobilePayUSA, NFC, RFID

PayPal Introduces Mobile to Mobile NFC Money Transfers

July 13, 2011 by Mobile Payment Magazine

PayPal introduced its money transfer widget at the MobileBeat technology conference in San Francisco on Wednesday. PayPal’s new widget uses Near-Field Communications technology, which lets you pay for purchases with a wave of your smartphone.

PayPal’s widget allows for money transfers between two NFC-enabled phone holders. Say you want to transfer money to another PayPal user. They’ll request a specific amount of money from you on their phone, and after you tap your NFC-enabled phones together, the cash transfers from your PayPal account to the other.

Read more, via Wired.com.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: MobileBeat, MobilePayment, NFC, PayPal

« Previous Page
Next Page »

STAY INFORMED

Twitter: MobilePmnt

Tags

American Express android Apple Apple Pay AT&T Bank of America boku China Facebook Gemalto google Google Wallet Intuit iPhone Isis MasterCard mFoundry Microsoft mobile banking mobile commerce mobile conferences mobile conferences 2011 MobilePayment Mobile Payment Research 2015 MobilePayments mobile wallet NFC Nokia Obopay Orange PayPal Research and Markets Samsung SMS Sprint Square Starbucks T-Mobile Unbanked VeriFone Verizon Visa Vodafone Wells Fargo Zong
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Copyright & Terms
  • Contact
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.