Mobile Payment Magazine

Featured

Consumers and Mobile Financial Services – Free Report

Mobile phones have increasingly become tools that consumers use for banking, payments, budgeting, and shopping. Given the rapid pace of developments in the area of mobile finance, the Federal Reserve Board began conducting annual surveys of consumers’ use of mobile financial services in 2011. This 78-page report, “Consumers and Mobile Financial Services” (March, 2015) examines trends in the adoption and use of mobile banking, payments, and shopping behavior and how the emergence of mobile financial services affects consumers’ interaction with financial institutions.

  • The Basics
  • News
  • Research
  • Events
  • Company Profiles
You are here: Home / Featured / Report: Leveraging An Omnichannel Approach To Drive $1.5B In Mobile Banking Cost Savings

Report: Leveraging An Omnichannel Approach To Drive $1.5B In Mobile Banking Cost Savings

August 14, 2013 by Mobile Payment Magazine

mobile-payment-report-omnichannelMobile bankers are valuable customers: rich, young, and flush with profitable bank products and services. The products and services are saving financial institution money — as the number of mobile bankers has grown, branch visitation has decreased considerably. However, mobile channels have not yet offset physical channel preference among mobile bankers.

For certain activities, mobile bankers inexplicably turn to the brick and-mortar branch at higher rates than all consumers. Identifying costly behaviors to transition to electronic channels is the first step for FIs looking to cut delivery costs. The next move is bolstering adoption of value-added services, which are not only profitable but also encourage overall use of the mobile channel.

Understanding how the mobile channel attracts consumers that use more bank resources requires analysis of these consumers’ behavior and product ownership. Drawn from robust consumer data, this report, entitled Leveraging An Omnichannel Approach To Drive $1.5B In Mobile Banking Cost Savings, provides best practices and recommendations to encourage consumers to maximize the potential of their mobile devices — and save FIs money in the process.

Primary Questions:

– What features make mobile bankers unique and valuable customers?
– To what extent has mobile banking lowered delivery costs for FIs?
– Why are mobile bankers still turning to the branch over electronic alternatives?
– Are further savings possible by encouraging the use of the mobile channel?
– Which behaviors should be targeted to encourage electronic channels over branch visitation?
– Which advanced mobile banking features are profitable for FIs and desired by customers?

Contents:
Overview
Primary Questions
Methodology
Executive Summary
Recommendations
What Sets Mobile Bankers Apart, and Why Are They Valuable?
Mobile Bankers Are Young
Mobile Bankers Are Wealthy
Mobile Bankers Are Early
Adopters
Mobile Banking Attracts New Relationships
Mobile Bankers Are Flocking to Bigger Banks
Mobile Bankers Are Adoring Mobile Apps, Which Increases Readiness for Advanced Features
Mobile Bankers Own More Profitable Financial Products and Services
Mobile Banking Adoption Is Saving FIs Money — $1.5 Billion More Can Be Saved
Why Do Mobile Bankers Go Into a Branch?
Which Behaviors Should Banks Target Among Mobile Bankers to Encourage Electronic Alternatives?
Mobile Bankers Still Turning to the Branch to Deposit Funds
FIs Can Save $1.5 Billion if Mobile Bankers Switch In-person Deposits to Mobile Once per Month
Mobile Bankers Show a Higher Preference for Using the Branch to Monitor Their Accounts
Mobile Bankers’ Use of CSRs Declines Over the Past Three Years
Further Driving Alert
Adopon Could Reduce Use of Costly Channels
Budgeting Tools Will Help Reduce Mobile Bankers’ In-Person Visits for Monitoring
Mobile Bankers Show Higher Interest in Advanced PFM
Mobile Banking Value-Added Services Can Increase Profits and Turn Mobile Bankers Into Power Users
Value-Added Services Satisfy Needs and Make Mobile Bankers More Profitable
Mobile Imaging Can Be Used to Attract Mobile Bankers
Market Prepaid Accounts to Mobile Bankers
Mobile Wallets Can Generate Revenue
Mobile Bankers Desire Location-Based Offers and Coupons
Mobile Bankers Use Mobile P2P, But Greater Adopon Is Necessary
Appendix
Related Research
Companies Mentioned

Table of Figures

Figure 1: Maximizing the Value of Mobile Bankers
Figure 2: Who Are Mobile Bankers in the U.S.?
Figure 3: Technology Attitudes of Mobile in Bankers Past 90 Days vs. Online Bankers in Past 90 Days
Figure 4: Recency of Joining Primary Bank by Mobile Bankers in Past 90 Days vs. Online Bankers vs. All Consumers (Benchmark)
Figure 5: Mobile Bankers in Past 90 vs. Non-mobile Bankers by Bank Size
Figure 6: Methods Used to Conduct Mobile Banking (2009–2012)
Figure 7: Financial Product and Service Ownership by Mobile Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. All Consumers
Figure 8: Financial Product Ownership, Selected Products by Mobile Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. All Consumers.
Figure 9: Percent of Mobile Bankers in Past 30 days vs. Percent of Branch Visits in Past 30 Days (2009–2013)
Figure 10: Reasons for Going to the Branch for Mobile Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. All Consumers
Figure 11: Top 3 Channels Mobile Bankers Prefer to Conduct Financial Behaviors
Figure 12: Estimated Cost per Transaction
Figure 13: Preferred Method to Deposit Funds by Online Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. Mobile Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. All Consumers
Figure 14: Rates of Deposit Through Physical Branch
Figure 15: Potential Annual Savings Per Mobile Banking Customer by Converting One Monthly Deposit to Mobile
Figure 16: Channel Preference for Monitoring Balances, Accounts, and Transfers by Mobile Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. Online Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs.All Consumers
Figure 17: Used a CSR to Perform Any Banking Function by Mobile Bankers in Past 90 Days vs. All Consumers 2011–2013 .
Figure 18: Use of Alerts in Past 90 Days by Mobile Bankers, Online Bankers, and All Consumers
Figure 19: Preferred Source for PFM for Online Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. Mobile Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. All Consumers
Figure 20: Likelihood to Use Advanced PFM Services if Available (Probably Would Use/Definitely Would Use) by Mobile Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. Online Bankers vs. All Consumers
Figure 21: Interest in Using Mobile Imaging to Compare Credit Card Rates by Segments
Figure 22: Prepaid and Checking Account Ownership by Mobile Bankers and All Consumers
Figure 23: Consumer Likelihood to Opt In to Mobile Delivery of Location-Based Offers or Coupons
Figure 24: Recency of Conducting a Mobile Person-to-Person Transfer by Mobile Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. All Consumers
Figure 25: Consumers Using Mobile Banking in Past 90 days vs. Never Used Mobile Banking by Age
Figure 26: Mobile Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. All Consumers by Annual Income
Figure 27: Mobile Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. Online Bankers vs. All Consumers by Investable Assets
Figure 28: Use of Bank Bill View by Mobile Bankers(Past 90 Days) vs. Online Bankers (Past 90 Days) vs. All Consumers
Figure 29: Consumer Phone Feature Use, 2010–2012

Companies Mentioned
– Chase
– Groupon

For more information, and to order: Research & Markets – Leveraging An Omnichannel Approach To Drive $1.5B In Mobile Banking Cost Savings

Related

Filed Under: Featured, Research Tagged With: Chase, Groupon, Research and Markets

STAY INFORMED

Twitter: MobilePmnt

Tags

American Express android Apple Apple Pay AT&T Bank of America boku China Facebook Gemalto google Google Wallet Intuit iPhone Isis MasterCard mFoundry Microsoft mobile banking mobile commerce mobile conferences mobile conferences 2011 MobilePayment Mobile Payment Research 2015 MobilePayments mobile wallet NFC Nokia Obopay Orange PayPal Research and Markets Samsung SMS Sprint Square Starbucks T-Mobile Unbanked VeriFone Verizon Visa Vodafone Wells Fargo Zong

News

Visa “Tap to Phone” Adoption Grows Rapidly

Today, Visa announced that Tap to Phone has experienced a 200% increase over the past year.

Is Your Business PCI Compliant?

A simple guide answering some frequently asked questions as well as debunking a couple myths about PCI compliance.

Nets and Oberthur Technologies Offer Mobile Payments to Scandinavian Banks

Nets, a payments service provider in Northern Europe, and OT (Oberthur Technologies), a global provider of embedded security software products, services and solutions, are partnering to service banks with a financial platform to support future international mobile payment means in the Nordics.

Kohl’s to Launch Mobile Payments

Kohl’s (NYSE: KSS) announced today the nationwide launch of Kohl’s Pay, a mobile payment option which integrates the Kohl’s Charge private label credit card into Kohl’s mobile app. Kohl’s Pay allows more than 25 million active card holders across the country to pay for their in-store purchases with their Kohl’s Charge card directly from their mobile device. Kohl’s Pay also its customers to apply their Kohl’s offers, Kohl’s Cash and Yes2You Rewards with a single transaction right from the mobile device at checkout.

Apple in Talks with Banks to Develop Mobile Person-to-Person Payment Service – Update – NASDAQ.com

Apple Inc. is in discussions with U.S. banks to develop a mobile person-to-person payment service that would compete with PayPal Inc.’s popular Venmo platform, according to people familiar with the talks. The talks are ongoing, and it is unclear if any of the banks have struck an agreement with Apple, these people said. Key details […]

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Copyright & Terms
  • Contact
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.